AddiFab

Addifab • Shipped 2022

Building the future of Additive Manufacturing

A complete redesign of the Addifab brand and digital experience to clearly communicate their groundbreaking Freeform Injection Molding (FIM) technology and position them for scale.

Role

Lead Designer

Duration

Feb 2019 - April 2023

Team

Headshot of a man with short brown hair wearing a light-colored collared shirt and a necklace with a dark cord against a neutral background.
Headshot of a man with short light brown hair and light beard wearing a black shirt against a plain gray background.
Smiling man with short dark hair and beard wearing a dark checkered blazer and white shirt against a blurred background.
Addifab primary logo

Context

Addifab developed Freeform Injection Molding (FIM) a hybrid manufacturing process combining 3D printing with injection molding. Despite having genuinely innovative technology, their website couldn't convert technical evaluators into qualified leads. Their 4-6 month sales cycle was killing growth.

I led a complete redesign of their brand identity and digital experience, restructuring how they communicate complex technical information. The result: a website that educates, qualifies, and converts manufacturing buyers automatically.

Challenge

Manufacturing buyers evaluate new technologies through specific criteria: capabilities, tolerances, materials, cost. Addifab's site opened with marketing fluff before establishing technical credibility.

Through 12 interviews with engineers and procurement managers, one insight shaped everything:

"I don't care if it's revolutionary. I need to know: what materials, what tolerances, what lead time, what cost per part."
– Mechanical Engineer, Medical Device Manufacturer

Website hero section for AddiFab showcasing freeform injection molding with image of injection molded parts and text about versatile hardware launchpad and product launch benefits.
1

Information Architecture

Navigation assumed familiarity with FIM. The structure was vendor-centric rather than buyer-centric. Engineers couldn't find a logical path through content.

2

Technical Communication Gap

FIM is unfamiliar to most engineers. The old site tried to explain everything at once with dense text. Result: 80% bounce rate on home page & internal explanation pages.

Contact form with fields for name, email, phone, address, subject, and message, and a Submit button, set against a dark background with 'HOW' text vertically on the left and a red decorative object on the right.
3

Zero Qualification

Generic contact forms generated 40+ monthly inquiries, but only 15% were qualified. Sales wasted hours on discovery with unqualified prospects.

Goal

Transform Addifab's digital presence to reduce time-to-qualification for prospects and increase inbound demo quality, enabling the sales team to focus on closing rather than educating.

Success Metrics

1

User Engagement

Increase visits to "Technology" and time spent on Materials pages, indicating improved understanding and self-service technical evaluation.

2

Conversion Growth

Increase demo requests and reduce bounce rates on key pages, showing stronger content relevance and visitor intent alignment.

3

Sales Enablement

Reduce average first-call duration by providing prospects with baseline FIM understanding before conversations. Improve sales team's perception of lead quality.

4

Operational Efficiency

Decrease technical support emails regarding materials, tolerances, and basic process questions through better self-service content.

Solution

A complete brand and digital redesign that transforms how Addifab communicates FIM technology. The new system provides visual clarity through a modernized identity, educational content architecture that guides technical buyers naturally, and a high-performance website that qualifies and converts prospects automatically.

1

Making FIM Understandable

Transformed complex technical explanation into a progressive three-step visual narrative that increased page engagement.

Website hero section showing injection molding machine with headline 'Accelerated development with unseen injection mold tooling' and three-step process images labeled Print, Inject, and Dissolve.
2

Materials as a Decision Tool

Created self-service material library with specifications, reducing support emails by 62% and making Materials the 2nd most-visited page.

Addifab materials page showing various plastic pellets with categories, tensile strength, HDT, and cost details for each material type.Popup material card detailing ABS plastic with image of gray pellets, showing properties like tensile strength 40-50 MPa, heat deflection temp 88-100°C, processing temp 210-270°C, shrinkage 0.4-0.8%, and key benefits including high impact resistance and easy painting.
3

Smart Qualification Flow

Designed a progressive form that captures project details before sales contact, increasing qualified leads from 15% to 67%.

Interactive screen with text 'Let's find the right solution for your project' and a Get Started button alongside an image of a blue industrial machine in a factory setting.Smart Qualification Flow interface with options about project needs alongside an overhead view of technical drawings and metal parts on a desk.Smart Qualification Flow Step 3 interface displaying a dropdown menu to select part types, next to a grid of various black and cream plastic mechanical parts on a gray background.Smart Qualification Flow Step 4 screen showing options for target production volume alongside a blurred factory production line with trays.User interface screen for Smart Qualification Flow Step 5 asking 'When do you need these parts?' with options for delivery time and quantity, shown next to a 3D printer printing a white object.User interface screen asking about specific material requirements with text input and continue button beside white bowls filled with various colored granular materials.Digital caliper, pen, and technical drawings on a dark work surface with a software interface asking for specific technical requirements or details.Contact form on screen titled 'How can we reach you?' with fields for name, email, company, and phone, alongside hands typing on a white keyboard.User interface for uploading CAD files with a drag and drop area, accompanied by a close-up image of a porous, grid-like material structure.Thank you message for Thomas with project follow-up steps and a 3D printed mechanical component with circular holes on a white surface.

Research & Insights

To get a deeper understanding of the landscape, I conducted a competitive audit across 8 additive manufacturing and industrial tech companies, including traditional injection molding providers and hybrid manufacturing competitors. I also conducted 12 in-depth interviews with engineers and procurement managers from automotive, medical devices, and consumer electronics industries to understand how they evaluate new manufacturing technologies.

The research revealed consistent patterns: technical complexity was presented before conceptual understanding, navigation structures assumed prior knowledge, and visual systems lacked the precision needed to convey manufacturing credibility.

Nine yellow sticky notes with user feedback and website issues, including unclear FIM definition, complex engineering terms, poor navigation, lack of top-level framing, static brand, missing visuals, unhelpful contact info, and competitors appearing more advanced.
1

Complexity killed clarity

The old site led with technical parameters before explaining what FIM was. Users needed simple understanding first.

2

Navigation assumed familiarity

Technical pages were buried and content had no flow. Users couldn't find a logical evaluation path.

3

Visual assets were inconsistent

No consistent typography, color system, or components. This eroded trust and made scalability difficult.

4

The brand looked dated

The visual design felt outdated and static. This disconnect undermined credibility with technical buyers.

Information architecture

The old navigation used marketing-focused labels like "Get Inspired" that didn't match how buyers evaluate manufacturing technologies. Critical information like materials and process explanations were buried. I rebuilt the information architecture around buyer evaluation patterns.

Navigation bar with menu items Home, Get Inspired, Media Coverage, Products, Downloads, Press & News, FIM Community, About; highlights unclear page title and low user visit on Media Coverage, and missing CTA on About.

I identified several issues that created confusion for technical evaluators, marketing-focused labels like "Get inspired" provided unclear value, "Media Coverage" and "Press & News" overlapped conceptually, and content was organized by format ("Downloads") rather than user need.

Diagram showing the before state of Addifab's information architecture with navigation categories and red annotations providing improvement suggestions.Information architecture diagram for Addifab showing main categories: Technology, Products, Applications, Services, Resources, and Get in Touch with subcategories and items listed under each.

Reorganized around clear, functional labels that match evaluation flow: understand technology → explore products → see applications → understand services → access resources → engage.

Website navigation bar with menu items Technology, Products, Applications, Services, Resources, Get in touch, and highlighted text showing 94% of users visited the Technology page.

40% decrease

In navigation misclicks

23% increase

in users reaching contact

2.1 → 4.8

pages per session

The streamlined structure enabled self-service behavior, directly contributing to the 62% reduction in technical support emails.

Brand Identity

Precision as a Credibility Signal

Addifab had a logo but no brand system. No colors, no typography standards, no visual guidelines. Every marketing material, social post, manual, and web page was built from scratch. I created a complete brand identity that scaled across all touchpoints while reflecting manufacturing precision.

Side-by-side comparison of AddiFab logo before and after redesign, showing updated font and icon style.Typography sample showing TT Norms is the brand new Addifab typeface with uppercase and lowercase AaBb on yellow, and text samples with bold and regular styles alongside numbers.Color palette grid showing shades of grey and yellow with detailed CMYK, RGB, HEX, Pantone, and RAL codes for each color.

Final designs

Making FIM understandable

The old explanation was a paragraph of impenetrable jargon with 80% bounce rate. The way we explained FIM to customers was always the same way: "First we print a scaffold, then we inject production material, then we dissolve the scaffold." Three steps. Visual. Sequential. Creating a step-by-step explainer, Print. Inject. Dissolve.

Translucent overlapping circular discs in shades of blue, purple, and pink on a light background.Translucent overlapping circular discs in shades of blue, purple, and pink on a light background.